Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Apple’

Il n’y a pas plus vert qu’Apple

September 25th, 2009 Comments off

Voilà maintenant plusieurs années que Greepeace avait entamé une campagne contre Apple afin de faire changer les techniques de production des produits d’Apple. Désormais, Apple manufacture des produits qui sont recyclable et qui ne comporte aucun produits considérés toxiques. Apple a élargi son programme de recyclage d’iPod et calcul désormais son impact sur l’environnement tout au long du cycle de vie des produits.

Pour plus d’informations: www.apple.com/environment/



MacBook Toxic Materials

MacBook Toxic Materials


iMac Product Mass Reduction

iMac Product Mass Reduction





Prophète ou simple coïncidence

March 11th, 2008 Comments off

Il m’arrive parfois de dire des phrases qui semble sans fondement. Il m’arrive de délirer à l’occasion car la folie est un état de conscience très sain (avec modération!), mais il m’arrive aussi d’émettre mes opinions sur tous les sujets qui me passent à l’esprit. Dernièrement, j’ai pu me rendre compte que mes dernières constatations sont désormais des faits véridiques et vérifiables.

Alors, qu’est-ce que j’ai dit de SI formidable, me direz-vous?

Dit: J’ai prédis que le iPhone deviendrait un téléphone VoIP.
Fait: Avec l’annonce du SDK par Apple, il est sûr que les développeurs porteront une application du style Skype très rapidement. [La politique d'utilisation du SDK n'empêche pas le VoIP]

Dit: J’ai dit que le monde allait manquer de nourriture.
Fait: Les nations unies ont émis un avis disant que la Chine avait mal estimé ces stocks. Par la même occasion, on apprend par l’ONU que les stocks de nourriture mondial sont au plus bas depuis les années 60. [Lu dans Maclean's]

Dit: J’ai dit que les économistes se réfugierait dans le pétrole pour récupérer les pertes causées par la baisse du dollar américain.
Fait: Le prix du pétrole est une étoile montante… Il y a une énorme spéculation autour du prix du barril de pétrole.

Prochaine prédiction concernant le pétrole: Nous allons bientôt apprendre que les stocks de pétrole ne sont pas aussi bon que l’OPEP le pensait. Ils ont d’ailleurs maintenu la production au même niveau que l’an dernier. Mon analyse me dit que nous avons atteint la production maximale en 2003 et que depuis, nous grugeons la réserve mondial disponible un peu plus chaque jour. Ce qui aura pour effet de faire grimper le prix du barril de pétrole, mais puisqu’il est déjà une grosse balloune, le prix va devenir ridicule.

Dernière prédiction pour ce soir: la téléphonie cellulaire tel que nous la connaissons aujourd’hui n’existera plus dans 10 ans. Elle sera remplacé par la voix sur IP et tout fonctionnera à partir des bornes sans-fil (Wi-Fi Internet) des gens à la maison. Le partage de nos connexions Internet avec le voisinage ne sera plus une erreur, mais planifié pour pouvoir profiter de notre environnement.

Why Amazon MP3 service is a great thing for Apple?

January 19th, 2008 Comments off

Everybody is talking about the new Amazon MP3 service which directly compete with the iTunes Store from Apple. Some are saying that it is the beginning of the end. I am saying the opposite. Apple is currently in court for monopoly over their iPod and iTunes services. It is not Apple’s fault if nobody was able to reproduce the success of the iTunes Store so far. Amazon has great chances to do so, but it will be good for Apple because it will give them arguments in courts. They are not the only one on the market right now. Microsoft tried it, Creative, Real, MTV, and many others tried it but they failed or were not able to replicate the same level of success…

Amazon MP3 services looks promising and if you look at the news lately, they even got contracts with all the major labels, which is great. Apple on the other hand lost some contracts over the last few months. It does not mean that Apple is in bad position, it just means that the labels must show that they still have the power over Apple. Which it isn’t so true anymore and they like the Apple store because it is really easy to manage for them.

Apple decided to put a one-price per song fee which is not making the major labels happy. I have one thing to say only: the major labels are wrong. It must stay like that or the iTunes Store will fail just like the other ones.

Plus, Apple will have to show “ouverture” and probably open their platform so if you don’t find a song on the iTunes Store then you can go on Amazon instead and buy it out from there. It will make customer’s life much easier but not Apple’s wallet of course! Well, they could get more money out of it. By selling more hardware, of course!

Why can we believe that Apple is still in really good relationship with the labels? Apple launched the iTunes Movie Rentals service last Tuesday and they have all the major studios. It’s no surprise to anyone to know that the major labels are also major studios. Universal and NBC, 20th Century FOX and… well FOX! It proves my point that the labels resigned from their restraining contract to be able to deal better clauses later. It will shake Apple down for a while but with 15G$ in bank, they can handle this also for a while.

Let’see who will win this battle: Apple, the major labels or the consumers.

Pourquoi un 8e membre au conseil d’administration?

January 8th, 2008 Comments off

Apple a décidé d’intégrer un 8e membre à son “Board of Directors”. Andrea Jung – chairman and former Avon CEO, elle se joint au rang des Eric Schmidt et Al Gore qui sont déjà parmi le groupe. Pour ceux que ça intéresse, voici la composition du Board à ce jour.

  1. Bill Campbell (Chairman and former CEO, Intuit Corp.)
  2. Millard Drexler (Chairman and CEO, J. Crew)
  3. Albert Gore Jr. (Former Vice President of the United States)
  4. Steve Jobs (CEO, Apple, Inc.)
  5. Andrea Jung (Chairman and CEO, Avon Products)
  6. Arthur D. Levinson, Ph. D. (Chairman and CEO, Genentech)
  7. Dr. Eric Schmidt (CEO, Google)
  8. Jerry York (Chairman, President and CEO Harwinton Capital)

Entre vous et moi, ce Board of Directors est très intéressant. Pourquoi avoir ajouté un 8e membre alors? Simplement parce qu’il manquait une vision féminine… peut-être. Mais, fait à noter, Andrea Jung parle mandarin, ce qui peut aider Apple selon moi. De plus, elle semble avoir une forte connaissance en la matière. Voici un extrait d’un article paru sur AppleInsider.com :

“She was elected president of global marketing in 1996, an executive vice president in 1997, president and a director of the company in 1998, chief operating officer from 1998 to 1999, chief executive officer in 1999 and chairman of the board in 2001. Previously, Jung was executive vice president of Neiman Marcus and a senior vice president for I. Magnin.”

Nous pouvons dire que ce fût une belle décennie pour madame Jung. Nous verrons bien où cela mènera Apple.

Grand parleur, petit faiseur…

October 28th, 2007 Comments off

Il y a quelques mois (presqu’un an maintenant) Apple a commencé à vendre des ordinateurs avec des processeurs Intel. Sur le moment, des tonnes de gens ont savourés ce moment et ces mêmes gens ont commencé à vouloir installé OSX sur des ordinateurs Toshiba et Dell. Ce que je trouve intéressant, c’est que maintenant nous en n’entendons plus parlés du tout. Est-ce que OSX est piraté par nos confrères avec des Dell et Toshiba afin de profiter de l’avantage technologique et d’un monde sans virus? Je ne crois pas. Pourtant, il n’y a pas si longtemps, certains croyaient que OSX se retrouveraient sur tous les ordinateurs PC-compatible. Pourquoi en est-il pas ainsi? OSX est pourtant un système très stable. Est-ce trop compliqué à faire? N’est-il pas compatible? Est-ce qu’Apple bloque certains processeurs et la course entre les hackers et la pomme n’en valait pas la peine?

Je me pose parfois beaucoup trop de questions. Mais avec la venu de Leopard (OSX 10.5) Je me demande pourquoi les utilisateurs de PC ne demandent pas à Apple de porter son système à toutes les saveurs de PC-Compatible!

Comment épargner nos vieille machines?

October 24th, 2007 Comments off

Vous est-il déjà arrivé d’espérer jusqu’à la dernière minute que votre rêve s’accomplisse? Plus d’une fois me direz-vous. Avec la sortie de Mac OS X Leopard vendredi, j’ai bien hâte de voir les nouveautés et l’accomplissement d’un travail acharné des employés d’Apple. Tout ceci semble très beau sur leur site, mais est-ce que ça va marcher?

Je gère un parc informatique de petite taille, un peu plus de 20 postes de travail. Sans compter les usagers mobiles avec des portables. Presque tous des Macs! Mais je considère mon lieu de travail mixte tout de même, car je gère aussi bien du Windows que du Mac et du Linux.

La nouvelle monture de OSX devrait permettre d’intégré tout ce beau matériel de façon plus transparente. J’ai bien hâte de voir! Par contre, la première question qui m’est venu à l’esprit: Est-ce que ça va bien rouler sur les vieilles machines?

Historiquement parlant, il n’y a pas vraiment de solution pour améliorer les performances de OSX. Il n’y a pas vraiment d’option dans les préférences Systèmes pour optimiser le dit système en élimninant certains éléments visuels qui prennent du temps CPU qui est inutile dans un environnement de travail. Il n’y a pas vraiment de “Switch ON/OFF” et je suis tané! Je veux rouler le dernier système sur mes machines sans pour autant écoper par la même occasion d’un ralentissement généraliser de la machine.

J’espère que les ingénieurs d’Apple ont pensé à leur plus grand fans! Ceux qui était parmi leur clientS en 2003-2004 et qui ont acheté des G5 et même des G4. Ceci dit: je suis un de leur plus grand fan et ce depuis 1983. J’ai grandi avec les Macs en commençant avec le SE/30. Mon père a acheté le Mac II, mais je ne m’en souviens guère, hélas!

Je vous en donne des nouvelles dans quelques semaines… Lorsque j’aurai eu le temps de tester avec un G4 Dual 500Mhz… cordonnier mal chaussé vous dites!

Je ne suis pas seul!

October 22nd, 2007 Comments off

Il semblerait que je ne suis pas le seul à croire en une collaboration entre Apple et Google en raison de la présence de M. Schmidth au sein du Board d’Apple. À la base, l’auteur parle du iPhone et du potentiel avec Google ainsi que le fameux prototype de téléphone cellulaire qui alimente les rumeurs avec Google. Bref, exactement ce que je pensais. Il parle également du potentiel énorme alentour du spectre de 700Mhz.

Je ne vous résumerai pas l’article plus longuement car je crois qu’il est très intéressant et pertinent lorsqu’il est lu en entier. Voici le lien: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20071019_003258.html

iPhone 3G coming soon!

October 15th, 2007 Comments off

As Steve Jobs was explaining earlier. The iPhone is currently working with GSM network only because 3G chip are using too much power and drain the battery quickly.

Today, Broadcom announced a new chip combining all technologies which consumes less battery power since there are less chip in the phone! I was expecting this since Steve announce publicly why not using a 3G chip.

Go see the details at Electronista or the complete press release on Broadcom‘s website

This will open the market in Canada. As of now, the only carrier working with GSM was Rogers but with a 3G phone, Apple could sell their handheld with any carrier in Canada and Asia next year and broaden their contracts in Europe. The only problem right now is the current chip provider for the iPhone but I guess they will soon offer something to compete with Broadcom.

What I was saying?

September 24th, 2007 Comments off

I just read an article entitled: “Wi-Fi and Cellular Merge in Nokia 6301

So, the dream I was talking earlier isn’t that far and we actually get closer every day now!

Scary thought about Apple

September 13th, 2007 Comments off

I just had a bad dream last night. Well, it was a bad dream at first then it became a really good one when I started admiring Apple again for their long-term vision.

Some rumors are traveling on the web about Apple considering participating in the government’s auction of the 700-MHz spectrum. While the idea seems foolish at first because Apple is a computer company, I thought, “It’s not true anymore with iTunes and the iPod”. I would consider Apple more like a Technology-related company and telecommunication are based on technologies. The problem is that telecom is really different from computers. Or so they are, right now!

According to Steve Jobs

If we believe what Richard Koman is saying in this article. “Steve Jobs is no fan of wireless carriers” and also “[while] Apple is leaning against the idea [of buying the spectrum], Jobs apparently has been giving the possibility serious consideration.” Then I thought, is it possible to run a Wi-Fi network over this spectrum? According to the article, it is. “both the iPhone and the iPod touch could run on the 700-MHz spectrum” The iPod Touch only have the Wi-Fi, so if it’s possible, then Steve Jobs said: “[..] Wi-Fi is far faster than the 3G networks.” This is no surprise and not a big news. But running a phone completely over Wi-Fi would be awesome and everything around wi-fi would then explode, like City-wide Wi-Fi network.

Still with me so far? because the best part comes here.

For the last 5 years or so, the big news in telecom was VOIP. It is the future because it is lowering the cost of telecom, or so they say! ;-) The problem with current telecom is their differences with the Internet. For example, if you want to call your friend in L.A and you are based in London, UK. VOIP must pass the information from a regular PBX system to the PSTN then to the Internet then pass it back to PSTN and PBX, lots of conversions! What if the Internet was becoming the place for all voice/data transfers. In 20 years, with P2P, anybody could start a “phone” service and relay VOIP. Also, most big ISP are also telecom companies… why manage both infrastructure when you can have only one?

Apple and Google

Apple has 13$B in cash right now, which makes them capable of buying the spectrum really easily. They would even have a couple of B$ to build the network itself. But why would they, right? It will take them too long to build it anyway and it’s not their cup of tea. Apple and Google have a partnership going on and I found it really interesting at first but since Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt joined Apple’s board, I was always wondering what the heck is he doing there? OK, Google/Apple built a Google Maps version for the iPhone. Sweet thing, but that’s it? Now, we know Google has been looking at the cellphone business for a couple of years now and I know also that they have most of the black-fiber market in the US. They are building an impressive infrastructure of datacenters in the US which I think may be used to lower the cost of bandwidth to ISPs around the country at the beginning but it could also be used to do VOIP. That’s the kind of partnership I was talking about. (A)iPhone<->(G)Network
Why Apple would put 9B$ of its own money in such a spectrum if they know that Google is also interested in it. Why not share it with our good partners, right?

OK, let’s dream a bit more. This spectrum must be OPEN. Which means any devices that wants to use it, could use it in theory. Isn’t what the Internet is all about anyway? By combining the Internet and the old telecom system together, we fix a century-long problem. Furthermore, I know that a (at least one) company located in Canada is selling modules for Telecom companies which is IP-based. This basically means, everything is manageable from a Support Center, like a web-based software. So no more guy in the tree around your building when you call your Phone Company and it takes a few seconds before being effective.

Dream goes on about voicemail

Visual voicemail is the most interesting feature (for me) on the iPhone. Apple has an exclusive contract with AT&T, but in Europe, Apple is in talk with many carriers. (T-Mobile of Germany, Orange of France and O2 in the UK) The most interesting bit is that each companies will have that feature built in their systems somewhere in their network but not widespread. While I am pretty sure the iPhone will stay locked for a while, I think it will be un-locked as soon as the companies will know how to implement this feature everywhere else making the iPhone full-featured on every market with many carriers. Apple will then probably license the feature to other cellphone-makers if it’s patented or own by Apple.

While I read somewhere that Google was also building a cellphone on their own. I think some news/rumors going around about both companies are somewhat just to confuse us or messed around for the sake of seeking public reaction. Apple is doing great right now and for the last decade it has been one of the most successful company and I think Apple will keep this position for a while because if the latter story becomes real, all iPhone and iPod touch sold starting June 29, 2007 could be upgradeable to this new VOIP network just by releasing a new software update. Having a cellphone upgradeable like that is just one of the best thing that could have happen now. I was suspicious about Apple being too involved with the Music and Movie industry but I guess Steve Jobs likes diversity as well. Steve: Let’s go fix all Telecom issues!

This dream will probably take 5 to 10 years before being a complete reality. Let’s see what happens.